Energy Dissipation in Hydraulic Structures: Principles and Techniques

 Lecture 14


Energy dissipation

When water spills and flows over the spillways, then it acquires a very high velocity, as the whole potential energy (due to potential head) is transformed into kinetic energy. The process of destruction of this kinetic energy is known as energy dissipation. Or,

When water flows over a spillway, it undergoes a transformation from potential energy to kinetic energy due to the drop in elevation (potential head). This results in water attaining a very high velocity as it moves downstream. However, this high-velocity flow can cause significant damage to the spillway structure, the downstream channel, and the surrounding environment if not properly managed. The process of reducing or destroying this kinetic energy to safe levels is known as energy dissipation. This process is critical in hydraulic engineering to ensure the stability and safety of hydraulic structures and their surroundings.

Why is Energy Dissipation Necessary?

High-velocity water flowing over a spillway possesses immense kinetic energy. If this energy is not dissipated, it can lead to:

·  Erosion: Scouring of the downstream riverbed and banks, potentially undermining the spillway structure.

·  Structural Damage: Damage to the spillway apron, stilling basin, or other downstream structures.

·  Environmental Impact: Disruption of aquatic ecosystems due to turbulent flows and sediment transport.

·  Safety Hazards: Risk to human life and property in downstream areas.

 

For the dissipation of the excessive kinetic energy possessed by the water the following two methods are commonly adopted.

(1) By developing a hydraulic jump.

(2) By using different types of buckets.

 

Hydraulic Jump

A hydraulic jump is one of the most common and effective methods of energy dissipation. It occurs when high-velocity, supercritical flow (Fr > 1) transitions to low-velocity, subcritical flow (Fr < 1). Hydraulic jumps are facilitated in stilling basins located at the base of spillways.

Types of Jumps

Different types of hydraulic jumps are developed on a horizontal floor. The jump form and its flow characteristics primarily depend on the Froude number (F₁) of the incoming flow, expressed as:

F1=V1/√(gy1)​​

where:

·         V1​ = mean velocity of flow before the jump,

·         g = acceleration due to gravity,

·         y1​ = pre-jump (initial) depth of flow.

 

Thus, hydraulic jumps may be classified according to the values of F1 as follows.

1.     F₁ = 1: Flow is critical; no jump forms.

2.     F₁ = 1 to 1.7: Undular jump with surface undulations; energy dissipation is low (~5%).

3.     F₁ = 1.7 to 2.5: Weak jump with small surface rollers; energy dissipation is ~20%.

4.     F₁ = 2.5 to 4.5: Oscillating jump with irregular jet oscillations; energy dissipation ranges from 20% to 45%.

5.     F₁ = 4.5 to 9: Steady jump, stable and well-balanced; energy dissipation ranges from 45% to 70%.

6.     F₁ > 9: Strong jump with rough water surface and high energy dissipation (up to 85%).

 

Hydraulic jump at the toe of a spillway

Jump Height and Tail Water Rating Curves

For a hydraulic jump to be developed in a rectangular channel the following equation must be satisfied,

Or,

  

 

Where,

·        y1 is prejump (or initial) depth;

·        y2 is post jump (or sequent) depth.

For a given discharge intensity q, the initial depth y1​ is determined by 

y1=q/V1,

where 

V1=2gH1​​​ (assuming no head loss).

To form a hydraulic jump across all discharge intensities, the sequent depth y2​ must correspond to y1​ based on the jump equation. By calculating y2 for various q values, a Jump Height Curve (J.H.C.) or Jump Rating Curve (J.R.C.) can be plotted.

The actual tailwater depth y2′ depends on downstream hydraulic conditions. Observing y2′ for different q values allows plotting a Tailwater Rating Curve (T.W.R.C.). These curves help analyze jump formation and tailwater interactions.

Jump Location

For a given discharge intensity q (and thus y1​), the location of a hydraulic jump downstream of a spillway depends on the relationship between the tailwater depth y2′​ and the sequent depth y2​. Three cases arise:

1.     Case 1y2′=y2

The jump forms precisely at the spillway toe, providing ideal scour protection.

2.     Case 2: y2′<y2​

The jump shifts downstream, causing severe erosion between the spillway and the jump location. This scenario should be avoided in design.

3.     Case 3y2′>y2

The jump is drowned or submerged near the spillway toe, reducing energy dissipation efficiency. This case is also undesirable.

The location of the hydraulic jump depends on the discharge intensity q and the corresponding tailwater depth y2′​. Since both q and y2′​ vary, the relationship between the Jump Height Curve (J.H.C.) and the Tailwater Rating Curve (T.W.R.C.) must be analyzed. These curves are plotted together, and their relative positions can result in five possible conditions given in Fig. below.  For each condition, specific measures are required to ensure the jump forms close to the spillway toe for effective energy dissipation and erosion control.

 

Fig: Tailwater conditions for the design of scour protection works

Condition 1

The jump height curve and the tail water rating curve are coinciding with each other for all the discharges. Thus, in this case for all the discharges jump will develop close to the toe of the spillway. As such a horizontal apron may be provided on the river bed downstream from the toe of the spillway. In such a case, a simple concrete apron of length 5 (y2 - y1) is generally sufficient to provide protection in the region of hydraulic jump, as shown in Fig.

Condition 2

When the jump height curve exceeds the tailwater rating curve for all discharge levels, the hydraulic jump will form further downstream from the spillway toe. To ensure the jump occurs closer to the spillway toe, the tailwater depth must be increased. This can be achieved through the following methods:

1.     Depressed Apron: Excavate the riverbed downstream of the spillway toe to create a horizontal or sloping depressed apron. The apron's dimensions should ensure the jump remains within its confines for all discharge levels.

2.     Stilling Basin: Construct a stilling basin by installing a sill or baffle on the riverbed downstream of the spillway toe. The basin's size and depth must be designed to contain the jump for all discharge conditions.

Fig. (a) Depressed horizontal floor; (b) Stilling basin for hydraulic jump

Condition 3

The jump height curve lies below the tailwater rating curve for all discharges, indicating that higher tailwater depths will result in a drowned jump, leading to minimal energy dissipation. To ensure the formation of a clear hydraulic jump, the following measures can be implemented:

a.      Install a sloping apron on the riverbed, extending from the spillway's downstream surface. The apron's slope should be designed to facilitate jump formation across all discharge conditions.

b.     providing a roller bucket type of energy dissipator. It consists of an apron, which is upturned sharply at ends.

(a)

(b)

Fig: Hydraulic jump on a sloping apron (a) and roller bucket (b)

Condition 4

The jump height curve exceeds the tailwater rating curve at low discharges but falls below it at high discharges. To ensure a hydraulic jump formation near the spillway, the following measures can be implemented:

a.      Install a stilling basin to induce a jump at low discharges, combined with a sloping apron to facilitate a jump at high discharges (Fig. a).

b.     Use a sloping apron positioned partly above and partly below the riverbed, allowing the jump to form on the lower section at low discharges and on the upper section at high discharges (Fig. b).

Fig.  (a) Sloping apron combined with a stilling basin; (b) Sloping apron partly above and partly below the river bed

Condition 5

At low discharges, the jump height curve is below the tailwater rating curve but exceeds it at high discharges. To ensure the hydraulic jump forms near the spillway, the following measures can be implemented:

a.      Install a sloping apron positioned partly above and partly below the riverbed. This allows the jump to form higher on the apron at low discharges and lower on the apron at high discharges.

b.     Construct a stilling basin with a sill or baffle to increase tailwater depth, promoting jump formation at high discharges. However, at low discharges, the stilling basin may further elevate the already excessive tailwater depth, resulting in a drowned jump and reduced energy dissipation. If this does not risk scour, the design can remain unmodified for low discharges.

Fig: sloping apron positioned partly above and partly below the riverbed

 

Stilling Basins

A stilling basin is a structure designed to contain a hydraulic jump, either partially or fully, to dissipate energy. It typically includes features such as chute blocks, baffle blocks, and end sills to shorten the hydraulic jump, thereby reducing the basin's length and cost. These components also enhance energy dissipation and stabilize the jump. The design of the stilling basin depends on the type of hydraulic jump, which is influenced by the Froude number (F₁) of the incoming flow.

U.S.B.R. Stilling Basins

Stilling basins for Froude number between 1.7 to 2.5

For Froude numbers between 1.7 and 2.5, a horizontal apron is sufficient in stilling basins. Since the flow exhibits minimal turbulence, additional accessories are generally unnecessary. However, the apron must be adequately long to fully contain the hydraulic jump. The required length is approximately 5 times the sequent depth (y2​), ensuring the jump remains within the apron.

Stilling basins for Froude numbers between 2.5 and 4.5

Type I stilling basin

 

 

Stilling basins for Froude numbers higher than 4.5

·        When the velocity of the incoming flow is less than 15 m/s :

 Type II stilling basin. 

·        When the velocity of the incoming flow exceeds 15 m/s :

Type III stilling basin

 

 

 

Bucket Type Energy Dissipators

A bucket-type energy dissipator, positioned at the spillway toe, deflects overflow water to reduce energy. It is suitable only for overflow spillways and is more cost-effective than stilling basins when the incoming flow's Froude number (F₁) exceeds 10. This is because high F₁ values result in significant differences between initial and sequent depths, necessitating larger, deeper stilling basins. Bucket dissipators are adaptable to various tailwater conditions but require a riverbed composed of solid rock for implementation.

The bucket type energy dissipators are of the following three types.

(i)               Solid roller bucket

(ii)             Slotted roller bucket

(iii)          Ski-jump (or flip or trajectory) bucket.

 

Build Struct : Exploring Insights of Civil Engineering

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post